Date: Friday 26 January 2007
Venue: The Church Rooms, Stow-on-the-Wold
Ø Some outgrow sales at the door and
local shops
Ø They cannot access the larger markets
independently
Hence they get together and target the larger outlets. Most honey purchased in Britain is not sold from British beekeepers. Until recently Nestle, using the brand name Gales, have been the major retailer. This honey is imported from overseas. British beekeepers have been unable to:
Ø Compete on price
Ø Access the market
In England,
the majority of honey (over 70%) is sold through 4 major outlets:
Ø Tesco
Ø Sainsbury
Ø Morrisons
Ø Safeway
Beekeepers had
found it impossible, acting individually, to access this market.
Consequently,
once a Beekeeper outgrows local and door sales, they face a huge problem.
Through these major retailers, a standard 1lb jar retails for c. £2.20. The “Big 4” now also sell regional specialities such as “Pure Italian Chestnut Honey” for c. £2.50 for 12 oz.
David’s honey
currently sells for between £2.75-£3.90/lb SO
IF a beekeeper can persuade a major supplier that the produce is a local,
high quality product, then they could
and should be able to find a market. The solution is to get together and
co-operate to target the larger outlets.
Beekeepers traditionally fear they will lose money if they market honey co-operatively. This is not necessarily the case. It depends on individual circumstances. Door sales and the local shop may be adequate but local sales require consistent input of time and effort.
Beekeepers
often forget to cost their time in working out the economics of honey
distribution. We need to cost in sales effort and distribution at a minimum of
£9/hour.
We need to calculate the cost of:
Ø Glass / jars
Ø Labels
Ø Filtering, bottling, set up
Ø Time
So when doing
an economic analysis of your operation to assess if the honey co-operative is
for you, it is essential to take all these factors into account.
Around the world, a number of major honey marketing organisations are co-operatives. E.g.
Ø Australia: Capilano
Ø USA: Sioux
Honey Association ~ markets most of the honey that comes out of the western
states of the USA, Georgia and Florida. Started in the 1920s by 5 beekeepers,
it now markets 20,000 tons of honey per annum.
Ø Canada: Beemaid
~ This co-operative also sells bee equipment at advantageous prices to
beekeepers
Ø Norway: Honnigcentralen
~ This co-operative markets 95% of the Norwegian honey crop. It is owned by
1800 producers and has an annual turnover of 6 million euros. It has 10
salaried employees.
Ø Established as a “not for profit”
co-operative in 1996
Ø Centred in North Warwickshire
Ø Nine directors
The founder
members were Jim Hopkins and Sam Greenbank. David was also involved from the
start.
David
described the strong sense of responsibility the founder members experienced as
they realised they were selling other peoples’ honey.
Ø Devised with Coventry and Warwickshire
Co-operative Development Association (CDA)
Ø Constituted as a “Service Co-operative”
~ a co-operative that does not own the members goods. It sells honey on behalf
of the members and returns the money to them
Ø Members sign a “Membership Agreement”
Ø No obligation on members to supply
Ø No obligation of Co-operative to sell
Ø No shares issued
1. Storage
One major
outlet, Rowse Honey Ltd, have a small number of preferred suppliers from whom
they like to buy in 10-tonne lots. So you have to accumulate a huge weight of
honey before they will buy from you.
The
Co-operative will only return an attractive price to members if it can sell
honey in jars, adding value to the honey and selling it at a reasonable
premium.
This requires
storage space!
2. Development of their own brand
3. Transport
The
Co-operative needs to be able to move large and heavy containers (barrels)
around the country. Today, the only honey FHC will handle in buckets is heather
honey.
Solutions to
these problems:
1. Jack Whalley
Jack was an
original member who owned a farm in North Warwickshire on part of which a
cement works had been built. Some associated redundant buildings were used to
store honey.
2. Sponsorship
Developing a
brand that a supermarket will take requires money. The FHC was loathe to go to
members for money for product development so they looked for sponsorship. They
received and accepted sponsorship and advice from Nestle (and indeed used a
packing plant owned by nestle for a while).
They developed
a brand called “Beekeeper Honey” which was offered by Nestle to Tesco who
brought it. Eventually, Nestle sold their ambient food arm to Premier Foods and
the arrangement broke down.
3. Hard work!
Ø Acceptance of own brand product by
Tesco
Ø Product development grant from Ministry
of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food (MAFF)-£15,000 to develop own product. “Mixed
Floral Honey”, “Heather Honey” and “Star Flower Honey” sold to wholefood
wholesalers. In addition, FHC attended the Food Expo at the National Exhibition
Centre in 2002.
Ø Supply agreement with English Heritage
since 2004
Ø Supply agreement with National Trust
![]()
The Co-operative sells tons of
jarred honey per annum to the latter two organisations. Both wanted to use
their own labels on the honey.
![]()
![]()
Members harvest honey into barrels ~ The barrel is best moved by putting
on a pallet.
![]()
Sample & “Supply Form” to FHC ~ 5mls of honey is sampled from the
top of every barrel and sent off. The barrel is sealed with a rubber bung. The
barrel is sampled again once it is delivered to the storage facility. The
member fills in a “Supply Form”. Check for Taste, Odour and Water Content.
![]()
Tested honey collection ~ Publish a number of collection dates. The collection
company (currently Pettifers of Coventry) has a list of all members and goes
round to collect.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sale to customer ~ FHC
sells as much honey as it can in jars. These are packed to order.
![]()
Payment to member ~ One of the biggest challenges for the Co-operative is cash
flow. The organisation doesn’t have a lot of capital so people who supply honey
to the co-operative have to wait until the honey is sold on. The crop starts to
arrive with FHC in August and this continues until February. The Directors make
a decision about how much FHC is able to sell in jars then release the rest in
barrels to the major purchasers such as Rowse.
Until all the
sales monies are worked out, beekeepers
are given a “base price” of currently c.£1.15-£1.25 / lb then, at the end of the
year, this is topped up with a second “bonus payment”.
In the last
couple of years, members have received
c.£1.35-1.40/lb for honey delivered to the co-operative in barrels.
Local Groups
Ø Work together to supply honey
Ø Often provide a pick-up point
Ø Often collaborate in other aspects of
beekeeping
Central
structure
Ø Identified officers for barrel supply,
testing, sales, invoicing, payments to members
Ø Nine Directors
Ø Formally constituted as a limited
company
Ø AGM open to all members
Ø Directorship for 3-year period
Ø No honoraria or other payments
Ø Professional book-keeper
Ø 1lb honey jar with lid @ £28/gross =
19.5p each
Ø Labels
-
Make your own
for free
-
Thornes
approx. 2p each
-
Bespoke
approx. 3p each
Ø Transport to shop (fuel) @ 2p per jar
(based on 50 jars & 5 miles distance)
Ø Time? Bottling, labelling &
delivery @ 2 min per jar = 30p/jar (@£9/hr)
SO Total Cost
= 54p per jar!
Ø Price to shop £2.00
Ø Cost of sales £0.54p
Ø Price to beekeeper = £1.46/lb
………and then
there’s travel to buy jars, storage space, space for bottling, drips &
spills, storing jars of honey, taking & recording orders, ensuring
continuity of supply etc.
So this
£1.46/lb isn’t much more than the
co-operative can pay!
Ø Sale of large quantity of honey for
little effort
Ø Possibilities for joint working &
networking
Ø Opportunity to influence UK honey
market
Ø Potential for joint purchase schemes
Ø The only thing that FHC buys &
sells to members is Apistan varroa treatment from Vita
Ø Slow payments
Ø Honey looses local provenance ~ This
puts a lot of people off the idea of joining. FHCdoes not have the current
organisational capability to
regionalise honey
Ø Some organisation required
Our Branch
Chair Martin Edwards thanked David for a really inspiring and for some,
undoubtedly opportunistic talk.